Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ºÀå ÁßÀÎ Áã¿¡¼­ À½½Ä¹°ÀÇ °æµµ°¡ ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎÀÇ Çظé°ñ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

THE EFFECTS OF DIETARY CONSISTENCY ON THE TRABECULAR BONE ARCHITECTURE IN GROWING MOUSE MANDIBULAR CONDYLE

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 31±Ç 2È£ p.228 ~ 235
À±¼®Èñ, ÀÌ»ó´ë, ±èÁ¤¿í, À̹̳ª, ±èÇüµÎ, ±èÁ¾Ã¶,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±¼®Èñ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»ó´ë (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁ¤¿í (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À̹̳ª (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÇüµÎ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁ¾Ã¶ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎÀÇ ¹ß´Þ°ú Áõ½ÄÀº ÃøµÎÇϾǰüÀý ºÎÀ§ÀÇ »ý¿ªÇÐÀû ȯ°æÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¶ó º¯°æµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ºÎÀ§¿¡ Àü´ÞµÇ´Â »ý¿ªÇÐÀû ÇÏÁßÀº ¼·ÃëÇÏ´Â À½½Ä¹°ÀÇ °æµµ¸¦ ´Ù¸£°Ô ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á º¯È­½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. À̹ø ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼ºÀå ÁßÀÎ Áã¿¡¼­ ºÎµå·¯¿î À½½Ä¹°ÀÇ ¼·Ãë¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀúÀÛ·ÂÀ» º¯È­½ÃÅ°´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎÀÇ Çظé°ñÀÇ ÇüŸ¦ º¯È­½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö ¹Ì¼¼Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù.
»ýÈÄ 21ÀÏ µÈ C57BL/6 Áã 36¸¶¸®¸¦ ¹«ÀÛÀ§·Î µÎ ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾ú´Ù. 8ÁÖ µ¿¾È ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ ÁãµéÀº ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ µüµüÇÑ µ¢¾î¸®ÀÇ »ç·á¸¦, ½ÇÇ豺ÀÇ ÁãµéÀº µ¢¾î¸®ÀÇ »ç·á¸¦ Àß°Ô °¥Àº ÈÄ ¹°°ú ¼¯¾î ºÎµå·´°Ô ¸¸µé¾î ¸Ô¿´´Ù ¶ÇÇÑ ½ÇÇ豺ÀÇ ÁãµéÀÇ ÇÏ¾Ç ÀýÄ¡¸¦ ÀÏÁÖÀÏ¿¡ µÎ ¹ø¾¿ Àß¶ó¼­ Âª°Ô ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù. 8ÁÖ ÈÄ ¸ðµç ÁãµéÀ» Èñ»ýÇÏ¿© ¿ìÃø ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎ¸¦ ÁغñÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ì¼¼Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþ ÃÔ¿µ°ú »ïÂ÷¿ø ¿µ»ó ºÐ¼®ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎ Çظé°ñÀÇ bone volume(BV), bone surface(BS), total volume(TV), bone volume fraction(BV/TV), surface to volume ratio(BS/BV), trabecular thickness(Tb. Th.), structure model index(SMI)¿Í degree of anisotropy(DA)¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ÀÌµé °ªÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ trabecular number(Tb. N.)¿Í trabecular separation (Tb. Sp.)À» °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ì¼¼Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþ¿µ»óÀ» ¾òÀº ÈÄ ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎÀÇ Á¶Á÷ Ç¥º»À» ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù.
¿¬±¸ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°¾Ò´Ù.
1. Bone volume fraction(BV/TV) , trabecular thickness(Tb. Th.)¿Í trabecular number(Tb. N.)°¡ ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ºÎµå·¯¿î À½½ÄÀ» ¸ÔÀÎ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒµÇ¾ú´Ù(p<0.05).
2. Trabecular separation(Tb. Sp.)Àº ºÎµå·¯¿î À½½ÄÀ» ¸ÔÀÎ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
3. Suface to volume ratio(BS/BV), structure model index(SMI), degree of anisotropy(DA)´Â µÎ ±º »çÀÌ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.05).
4. Á¶Á÷ ÀýÆíÀ» °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú, ºÎµå·¯¿î »ç·á¸¦ ¸ÔÀÎ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎÀÇ ¿¬°ñÃþÀÇ Áõ½Ä Ãþ°ú Àüü µÎ²²°¡ »ó´çÈ÷ °¨¼Ò ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

The development and proliferation of the mandibular condyle can be altered by changes in the biome¡þchanical environment of the temporomandibular joint. The biomechanical loads were varied by feeding di¡þets of different consistencies. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether changes of masticatory forces by feeding a soft diet can alter the trabecular bone morphology of the growing mouse mandibular condyle, by means of micro-computed tomography.
Thirty-six female, 21 days old, C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided¢¥ into two groups. Mice in the hard-diet control group were fed standard hard rodent pellets for 8 weeks. The soft-diet group mice were given soft ground diets for 8 weeks and their lower incisors were shortened by cutting with a wire cutter twice a week to reduce incision. After 8 weeks all animals were killed after they were weighed. Following sacrifice, the right mandibular condyle was removed. High spatial resolution tomography was done with a Skyscan Micro-CT 1072. Cross-sections were scanned and three-dimensional images were reconstructed from 2D sections. Morphometric and nonmetric parameters such as bone volume(BV), bone surface(BS), total volume(TV), bone volume fraction(BV/TV), surface to volume ratio(BS/BV), trabecular thickness(Tb. Th.), structure model index(SMI) and degree of anisotropy(DA) were directly determined by means of the software package at the micro-CT system. From directly determined indices the trabecu¡þlar number(Tb. N.) and trabecular separation(Tb. Sp.) were calculated according to parallel plate model of Parfitt et al.. After micro-tomographic imaging, the samples were decalcified, dehydrated, embedded and sectioned for histological observation.
The results were as follow
1. The bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness(Tb. Th.) and trabecular number(Tb. N.) were signifi¡þcantly decreased in the soft-diet group compared with that of the control group(p<0.05).
2. The trabecular separation(Tb. Sp.) was significantly increased in the soft-diet group(p<0.05).
3. There was no significant differences in the surface to volume ratio(BS/BV), structure model index(SMI) and degree of anisotropy(DA) between the soft-diet group and hard-diet control group(p>0.05).
4. Histological sections showed that the thickness of the proliferative layer and total cartilage thickness were significantly reduced in the soft-diet group.

Å°¿öµå

ºÎµå·¯¿î À½½Ä;ÀúÀÛ·Â;ÇÏ¾Ç °úµÎ;¹Ì¼¼Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ;Çظé°ñ ÇüÅÂ;Soft-diet;Masticatory force;Mandibular condyle;Micro-computed tomography;Trabecular bone architecture

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI